RESUMO
Cervical cancer is the fourth most common cancer in women, and seventh overall. This disease represents a medical, economic and social burden. In early FIGO stage patients (IA, IB1 and IIA1), nodal involvement is the most important prognostic factor. Imaging evaluation of nodal metastasis is of limited value. In order to determine lymph node involvement, allow loco-regional control of the disease, define the need for adjuvant radiotherapy and improve survival, standard surgery for early disease is radical hysterectomy with systematic pelvic lymphadenectomy. However, this surgical treatment has risks and complications: longer operative time, larger blood loss, neurovascular or ureteral injury, lower-limb lymphedema, symptomatic lymphocysts, hydronephrosis. A method that allows to define the presence of regional metastasis with less morbidity and equal or greater precision is particularly relevant. The use of the sentinel lymph node biopsy is intended to reach that purpose. The present study reviews recent literature on the role of sentinel lymph node biopsy in cervical cancer, analyzing its indications and contraindications, injection and detection techniques, tracers used, surgical and pathological approaches and its applicability in up-to-date clinical practice.
RESUMO
No disponible
Assuntos
Humanos , Feminino , Programas de Rastreamento/métodos , Neoplasias do Colo do Útero/patologia , Infecções por Papillomavirus/patologia , Neoplasias do Colo do Útero/prevenção & controle , Detecção Precoce de Câncer/métodos , Manejo de Espécimes/normas , Fatores EtáriosRESUMO
No disponible
Assuntos
Detecção Precoce de Câncer/métodos , Neoplasias do Colo do Útero/diagnóstico , Infecções por Papillomavirus/diagnóstico , Programas de Rastreamento/métodos , Testes Obrigatórios , Esfregaço Vaginal/métodos , Teste de Papanicolaou/métodos , Fatores Etários , Papillomaviridae/patogenicidade , Análise Custo-BenefícioRESUMO
Las vacunas frente al cáncer de cérvix se han implementado, en un amplio número de países del mundo, dentro de los programas de vacunación sistemática. Asimismo se ha recomendado la vacunación de rescate en adolescentes y mujeres jóvenes. Desde la perspectiva de salud pública, la vacunación rutinaria en mujeres de mayor edad no se plantea por motivos de coste-efectividad. En estos casos son el médico y la paciente los que, de forma individualizada, deben decidir sobre la vacunación. Una encuesta de opinión dirigida a ginecólogos españoles que desarrollan su actividad asistencial en el ámbito de la patología cervical y colposcopia evidencia que, incluso en este colectivo, hay un relativo desconocimiento sobre aspectos importantes de la vacuna frente al cáncer de cérvix en mujeres fuera de los programas de vacunación sistemática, con o sin infección por el virus del papiloma humano (VPH) o lesión cervical. Además se constata la demanda de mayor información y poder disponer de recomendaciones específicas acerca de este tema. En el presente artículo se revisan las evidencias sobre la infección VPH y el riesgo de cáncer de cérvix a lo largo de la vida, la eficacia de las vacunas en relación con la edad o tras el tratamiento de lesiones cervicales, y la perspectiva del médico y de la mujer. Finalmente se presentan unas recomendaciones, a modo de guía clínica, sobre la vacunación en mujeres fuera de los programas de vacunación sistemática, con o sin infección o lesión cervical (AU)
Vaccines against cervical cancer have been implemented in a wide number of countries around the world as part of systematic vaccination programmes. In addition, rescue vaccination has been recommended for teenagers and young women. From a Public Health perspective, routine vaccination in older women is not proposed for reasons of cost-effectiveness. In these cases, the physician and the patient must decide about the suitability of vaccination in each individual. An opinion poll of Spanish gynaecologists rendering health-care services in the area of cervical pathologies and colposcopy has shown that, even among this group, there is relative lack of knowledge about important aspects of the vaccine against cervical cancer in women outside systematic vaccination programmes, with or without HPV infection or cervical lesions. In addition, the demand for greater information has been confirmed, as has the wish for specific recommendations on this topic. The present article reviews the evidence on HPV infection and the lifelong risk of cervical cancer, the efficacy of vaccines with respect to age or after the treatment of cervical lesions and the perspectives of physicians and women. Finally, some recommendations are made by way of clinical guidance for the vaccination of women outside systematic vaccination programmes, with or without infection or cervical lesion (AU)
